Navigation

  1. Home
  2. Provisions
  3. Part VI: Transitional Provisions
  4. Article 29: Interim Provisions on Trade-Related Matters
  5. 29(2)

(a) Trade in Energy Materials and Products and Energy-Related Equipment between Contracting Parties at least one of which is not a member of the WTO shall be governed, subject to subparagraph (b) and to the exceptions and rules provided for in Annex W, by the provisions of the WTO Agreement, as applied and practised with regard to Energy Materials and Products and Energy-Related Equipment by members of the WTO among themselves, as if all Contracting Parties were members of the WTO.

(b) Such trade of a Contracting Party which is a state that was a constituent part of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics may instead be governed, subject to the provisions of Annex TFU, by an agreement between two or more such states, until 1 December 1999 or the admission of that Contracting Party to the WTO, whichever is the earlier.

Notwithstanding the listing of paragraph 6 of article XXIV of the GATT 1994 in Annex W (A)(1)(a)(i), any signatory affected by an increase in customs duties or other charges of any kind imposed on or in connection with importation or exportation referred to in the first sentence of that paragraph, is entitled to seek consultations in the Charter Conference.

(a) Where a provision of [WTO]1 referred to in this paragraph provides for joint action by [Members of the WTO]2, it is intended that the Charter Conference take such action.3

 

1Editor's note: original "GATT 1947 or a Related Instrument", adapted by editors.

2Editor's note: original "parties to the GATT", adapted by editors.

3Editor's note: part (b) of the Understanding became irrelevant following the entry into force of the Amendment to the Trade-Realted Provisions of the Energy Charter Treaty.

On sait depuis longtemps que travailler avec du texte lisible et contenant du sens est source de distractions, et empêche de se concentrer sur la mise en page elle-même. L'avantage du Lorem Ipsum sur un texte générique comme 'Du texte. Du texte. Du texte.' est qu'il possède une distribution de lettres plus ou moins normale, et en tout cas comparable avec celle du français standard. De nombreuses suites logicielles de mise en page ou éditeurs de sites Web ont fait du Lorem Ipsum leur faux texte par défaut, et une recherche pour 'Lorem Ipsum' vous conduira vers de nombreux sites qui n'en sont encore qu'à leur phase de construction. Plusieurs versions sont apparues avec le temps, parfois par accident, souvent intentionnellement (histoire d'y rajouter de petits clins d'oeil, voire des phrases embarassantes).

RWE Innogy GmbH and RWE Innogy Aersa S.A.U. v. Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/34

  • >Claimant : RWE Innogy GmbH, RWE Innogy Aersa S.A.U.
  • >Nationality : Germany, Spain
  • >Respondent : Spain
  • >Procedural rules applied : ICSID
  • >Chair : Samuel Wordsworth
  • >Arbitrator appointed by Claimant : Judd Kessler
  • >Arbitrator appointed by Respondent : Anna Joubin-Bret
  • >Invoked instruments : ECT
  • >Articles mentioned : Article 36 (7)
  • , Article 27 (3)
  • , Article 26 (1)
  • , Article 26 (3)
  • , Article 26 (4)
  • , Article 26 (6)
  • , Article 25 (1)
  • , Article 24 (2)
  • , Article 21 (7)
  • , Article 21 (5)
  • , Article 10 (8)
  • , Article 10 (7)
  • , Article 10 (1)
  • , Article 9 (4)
  • , Article 6 (1)
  • , Article 1 (2)
  • , Article 1 (3)
  • , Article 1 (6)
  • , Article 1 (7)
  • , Article 1 (8)
  • , Article 1 (10)
  • , Article 1
  • , Article 2
  • , Article 10
  • , Article 13
  • , Article 16
  • , Article 21
  • , Article 24
  • , Article 25
  • , Article 26
  • >Breaches alleged :  
  • >Breaches found :(10.1) Unreasonable or discriminatory measures
  • (10.1) Fair and equitable treatment
  • >Case status : Award rendered
  • >Year of the award or agreement : 2020
  • >Follow-on proceedings : Pending ICSID annulment proceedings
  • >Year of registration : 2014

  • >Subject matter of the dispute: Legal reforms affecting the renewable energy sector
  • >Amount claimed: EUR 267.7 million
  • >Amount awarded: EUR 28,080,000
  • >Valuation method: income-based approach
  • > Interest rate: host State's sovereign bonds (10-year)
  • >Costs of arbitration: USD 1,431,480.72
  • >Award legal costs: Claimants were awarded EUR  2,373,909.24 (50% of legal costs for  jurisdiction and liability phase)
  • >Award costs of arbitration: Costs follow the award

 

ARBITRAL DECISIONS

30 December 2019 

Decision on Jurisdiction, Liability and Certain Issues of Quantum

18 December 2020 

Award

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 December 2020 

Separate Opinion of Mr. Judd L. Kessler