(1) Investments of Investors of a Contracting Party in the Area of any other Contracting Party shall not be nationalised, expropriated or subjected to a measure or measures having equivalent to nationalisation or expropriation (hereinafter referred to as “Expropriation”) except where such Expropriation is:
Such compensation shall amount to the fair market value of the Investment expropriated at the time immediately before the Expropriation or impending Expropriation became known in such a way as to affect the value of the Investment (hereinafter referred to as the “Valuation Date”).
Such fair market value shall at the request of the Investor be expressed in a Freely Convertible Currency on the basis of the market rate of exchange existing for that currency on the Valuation Date. Compensation shall also include interest at a commercial rate established on a market basis from the date of Expropriation until the date of payment.
(2) The Investor affected shall have a right to prompt review, under the law of the Contracting Party making the Expropriation, by a judicial or other competent and independent authority of that Contracting Party, of its case, of the valuation of its Investment, and of the payment of compensation, in accordance with the principles set out in paragraph (1).
(3) For the avoidance of doubt, Expropriation shall include situations where a Contracting Party expropriates the assets of a company or enterprise in its Area in which an Investor of any other Contracting Party has an Investment, including through the ownership of shares.
AES Corporation and Tau Power B.V. v. Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/16
Award, 1 November 2013, paragraphs 279, 289, 317, 324; 329-330; 398-409; 418; 441
Award, 23 September 2010, paragraphs 14.3.2-14.3.4;
Mohammad Ammar Al-Bahloul v. Republic of Tajikistan, SCC Case No. V064/2008
Partial Award on Jurisdiction and Liability, 2 September 2009, paragraphs 281, 282, 284, 285
Award, 19 December 2013, paragraphs 1205-1207
Blusun S.A., Jean-Pierre Lecorcier and Michael Stein v. Italian Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/3
Final Award, 27 December 2016, paragraphs 398-399, 401; 403; 404; 407-409
Charanne and Construction Investments v. Spain, SCC Case No. V 062/2012
Award, 21 January 2016, paragraphs 458-467
Award, 4 May 2017, paragraphs 353-354; 760-763
Electrabel S.A. v. Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/19
Decision on Jurisdiction, Applicable law and Admissibility, 30 November 2012, paragraphs 6.52-6.64
Hulley Enterprises Limited (Cyprus) v. Russian Federation, PCA Case No. AA 226
Final Award, 18 July 2014, paragraph 1580-1592
Isolux Netherlands, BV v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case V2013/153
Final Award, 17 July 2016, paragraphs 826-854
Ioannis Kardassopoulos v. The Republic of Georgia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/18
Decision on Jurisdiction, 6 July 2007, paragraphs 387-397; 407
Decision on Jurisdiction, 25 July 2012, paragraphs 296; 366
Libananco Holdings Co. Limited v. Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/8
Award, 2 September 2011, paragraph 570
Liman Caspian Oil BV and NCL Dutch Investment BV v. Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/14
Excerpts of Award, 22 June 2010, Paragraphs 430-438
Award, 30 March 2015, paragraphs 574-575; 578-580
Nykomb Synergetics Technology Holding AB v. The Republic of Latvia, SCC
Award, 16 December 2003, section 4.3.1
Petrobart Limited v. The Kyrgyz Republic, SCC Case No. 126/2003
Award, 29 March 2005, page 77
Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24
Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005, paragraphs 190-193; 227; 266-267
Veteran Petroleum Limited (Cyprus) v. Russian Federation, PCA Case No. AA 228
Final Award, 18 July 2014, paragraph 1580-1592
Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v. Russian Federation, PCA Case No. AA 227
Final Award, 18 July 2014, paragraph 1580-1592